Using math to help predict the outcome of a sporting event is something that has been done for years. That's what statistical handicapping is all about.
In recent years, there has been a tendency to use the Pythagorean Formula to determine how many games a team should have won in any years based on its scoring, both for and against. It is frequently used for baseball and the general premise is that "Expected wins = runs scored(2)/runs scored(2)+ runs allowed(2)."
Later, the
exponent was changed from 2.0 to 1.83. The theory behind the method is that
teams who won fewer or more games than expected could be good wagers to see a reversal the following
year.
The method has been altered for
nearly all sports, which use the same premise, but use different numbers. Many
times the method is referred to as the Pythagorean Expectation.
Pythagorean
Formula in the NBAFor each team playing, you would need its spread results for each of those three categories and you would then total them up.
Using a game between Philadelphia
and Boston at Boston for an example, let's assume the 76ers are 7-9 against the
spread on the road; 4-4 on the road against .500 or better opponents; and 5-4
on the road against divisional opponents. When you total the 76ers' spread
record:
On the road: 7-9
On road vs. 500+: 4-4
On road vs. division: 5-4
You will get 16-17.
For Boston, we'll use the following:On the road: 7-9
On road vs. 500+: 4-4
On road vs. division: 5-4
You will get 16-17.
At home: 10-6
At home vs. 500-: 6-5
At home vs. division: 6-4
When you total Boston's spread records you will get 22-15
The first step is to take the road
team's spread wins (in this case 16) and add them to the home team's losses,
which is 15, to get a total of 31. Next, take the home team's spread wins (22)
and add them to the road team's losses, which total 17, to get a total of 39.
The next step is to square both
numbers, hence the Pythagorean Formula name, and 31*31=961 and 39*39=1521.
Because the
home team is classified as A-squared, we will calculate the home's teams
percentage of covering the spread. The Pythagorean Formula has you divide
A-squared by A-squared + B-squared, so our formula for this game will read
"1521/1521+961 or 1521/2482=.613 or 61.3%, meaning Boston has a 61.3%
chance of covering the point spread.
Patterson and Painter said to look
for favorites with a greater than 70% chance of covering the spread or
underdogs with a greater than 58% chance of covering.
Pythagorean
Formula in the NCAA
The formula is the same for college
basketball in that you divide A-squared by A-squared + B-squared, but the
difference is the categories used. For the NCAA, I would use: home and away;
favorite or underdog; and conference or non-conference.
Using the Thursday, Feb. 7, 2013, game between Washington and UCLA in Los Angeles, lets assign the following for Washington:
Away: 6-3
Underdog: 6-3
Conference: 7-2
When you total Washington's record you get 19-8.
For UCLA, we'll assign the
following:
Home: 6-7
Favorite: 6-13
Conference: 4-5
When you total UCLA's record you get 16-25.
Adding Washington's wins to UCLA's
losses gives a total of 44 and adding UCLA's wins to Washington's losses gives
a total of 24.Home: 6-7
Favorite: 6-13
Conference: 4-5
When you total UCLA's record you get 16-25.
When both numbers are squared, we
get 44*44=1936 and 24*24=576. Now the formula will read 576/576+1936 or
576/2512=.229, meaning UCLA has a 22.9% chance of covering the spread, so the
play would be on Washington. UCLA won 59-57 as 7.5-point favorites.
Like many
other articles, this is one of those that I am throwing out there for you to
examine and play around with. I wouldn't blindly wager on its games, but do
some tinkering and see if it still holds any value.